My theme for this year’s A to Z Challenge is the A to Z of Democracy. This is your trigger warning. If you are going to be bothered by my descriptions of what I believe America should look and feel like, please stop reading and come back next year when my topic may go back to music or scrapbooking or interesting tidbits. Please respect my space and DO NOT leave disinformation or inflammatory statements in the comments. It’s my blog and I will delete them. Thanks for your cooperation.
| Knowledge | Kangaroo Court |
| Knowing something through experience or association. The body of truth. Being aware of something. | Finding someone guilty without good evidence. Ignores recognized standard of law. |
They say “knowledge is power” but in this day and age finding the truth is getting more and more difficult. We used to have a thing called the “Fairness Doctrine” where both sides of a situation needed to be presented equally so that people could make informed decisions. From Wikipedia:
“The Fairness Doctrine had two basic elements: It required broadcasters to devote some of their airtime to discussing controversial matters of public interest, and to air contrasting views regarding those matters. Stations were given wide latitude as to how to provide contrasting views: It could be done through news segments, public affairs shows, or editorials. The doctrine did not require equal time for opposing views but required that contrasting viewpoints be presented. The demise of this FCC rule has been cited as a contributing factor in the rising level of political polarization in the United States.”
In 1987 the Fairness Doctrine was repealed because critics argued that it violated the first amendment rights. That paved the way for broadcasters such as Rush Limbaugh to get a foothold and now as we can see Fox Entertainment doesn’t care whether they report the truth or not, yet many people rely on them for as their news source.
This in turn led to the kangaroo court (think Hilary’s emails, Hunter’s laptop, etc) and also to the investigations into such people as Leticia James, Mark Kelly and Jack Smith to name a few.
So what are we to do now? I think if we want to have the knowledge to make informed decisions we need to listen to more than one news outlet. We need to do our own research to make sure we are getting the actual facts. That’s why I like Heather Cox Richardson so much. When she writes she includes the sources for all of her facts and encourages us to check her statements.
Here in California we have a situation where our frontrunner for Democratic governor of our state, Eric Swalwell, has been accused of sexual assault by a few of his staffers (I think 4 so far). Because of this he has removed himself from the race. Some folks are claiming that it is horrible for him to be judged before the case has had its day in court but at the same time, there is a lot at stake in our race because California has what they call a jungle primary and the two top vote getters move on to the general election. That could mean that two republicans could win. We can’t take the chance of having no democrat on the ticket. If, in fact, the allegations are not true, Swalwell could run again in a few years if he wants.
As always, credit goes to Speaker Hakeem Jeffries who gave an impassioned speech on the floor of the House of Representatives at the beginning of the 218th congress.

As a Canadian, I shudder at the way truth and knowledge is being suppressed or twisted around to say whatever politicians want. Our news sources and the BBC may not be perfect, but they are way better than Fox! I read Heather’s articles, too.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Isn’t Heather great? I am so disgusted by Fox. I would boycott them completely but sometimes they have the Giants games on and I gotta watch my baseball!
LikeLike
There should be a rule that all politicians must live by: just because you are in politics does not make you above the law.… SMH
Cheers,
Barbie
LikeLiked by 1 person
It’s not so much that there is no rule, it’s just that it doesn’t seem to be enforced!
LikeLike
Another good clarification
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks Derrick. Appreciate your comments.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for the refresher on the fairness doctrine. Things have gotten so polarized since someone threw that out.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I didn’t know about it either until I read about it in one of Heather Cox Richardson’s letters. It makes total sense though.
LikeLiked by 1 person